@ErrataRob That paragraph discusses many things and you're ignoring the whole paragraph to focus on one part. Pretty annoying and hilarious.
-
-
Replying to @ioerror
@ioerror Assuming this is all exacting, it's not like you need to obfuscate for NSA's cover. So why not divulge more specifics?@ErrataRob3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Packetknife
@ioerror I'm asking because it would seem one way to shut@ErrataRob up if he is way off base - in many circles. I'm sincerely curious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Packetknife
@Packetknife@ErrataRob I don't want to shut anyone up but that doesn't mean what he says is correct or right or reasonable.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ioerror
@ioerror Actually, and also of interest, are you yourself in the editorial chains of stories you're listed on?@ErrataRob1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Packetknife
@Packetknife@ErrataRob Of course. I'm a journalist and we publish what we agree is in the public interest. That is a team process.4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ioerror
@ioerror I'm OK with that - pseudo-code as source protection (if it'd work out that way) - just lends to these "disagreements"..@ErrataRob3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Packetknife
@Packetknife@ioerror I can confirm it's "real" code that would compile and run in XKeyScore -- I just don't know if it's "operational" code4 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@ErrataRob@Packetknife How can you confirm that? Have you had access to XKEYSCORE? Are you cleared?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ioerror
@ioerror@Packetknife I'm an expert in deep-packet-inspection, and have seen other XKeyScore code6 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
@ErrataRob @ioerror @Packetknife Good way 2 troll tho, & generate pageviews/controversy. Why focus on negative? Leave that 4 TV pundits?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.