@KayOrder @inthecloud247 @buberzionist And we r close 2 being best on freedom of the press. & separation church/state. No, I'll stay, thanks
@KayOrder I also fear such a broad and unclear definition of an enemy. How can we 'win' and declare a return to normal? Who can surrender?
-
-
@inthecloud247 Sometimes, we bound together 2, 3 or more groups into a country, with NOTHING in common. -
@KayOrder think that was done on purpose. Divide and conquer policies, no? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@inthecloud247 In some cases, we did "better", e.g. India-Pakistan division, though never "perfect". -
@KayOrder ru saying colonial-era national borders should be redrawn? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@inthecloud247 It's the political boundaries that we drew around "countries", and that we believe are somehow real.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@inthecloud247 That's something that we have to make adjustments for. Enemies aren't states, per se (they never actually were).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@inthecloud247 Case in point - Syria should never have been a single country. Kurds, Alawites, Sunnis and Druze should have had 4 "states"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@inthecloud247 Lebanon, another example - Muslims and Christians should have had 2 separate entities.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.