Is it possible to white list some branches? I don't want to delete my PROD branch when it is merged into the master
-
-
-
add the sensitive branches to the Protected branches list in Settings | Version control | Git. BTW, IDE just shows a suggestion, no need to delete anything if you don't want
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would be cool do perform this action with hotkey. Maybe you can provide configurable type of notification: balloon or window. Then I just can press alt+y mnemonic ;)
-
feel free to comment in https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-130541 …, as the notification format was intended decision
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's interesting how it suggests to delete my client's "develop" branch often :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I somehow miss the point? I only need to see how the changes affected the code, not every merge and which branches once existed (depends, of course). If the branch only gets grayed out in the history, it doesn't really add to clarity? And, of course: Comic from
@PortugueseGeesepic.twitter.com/mh55Mguu8k
-
there are filter in the Log that allows you to disapley only aprticular branches. There is also a separate view - Hisotry for selected file or folder
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Isn’t it required to perform ‚git fetch —all —prune‘ on every other client, to prevent them from pushing the remote branch again?
-
by defaut in git only the current branch is pushed, so unless someone decides to push all branches at once, foing fetch --all --prune is not necessary
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.