Intactive

@intactive

Intactivist, i.e. one who works to end to ALL non-consented, non-therapeutic genital cutting, male, female or intersex., as human rights violations.

Joined June 2009

Media

  1. 5 hours ago
    Replying to
  2. 6 hours ago
    Replying to and

    ... all men who either asked to be cut (selection bias) or needed it (cause and effect). To say there is "no difference in sensation" is simply absurd to anyone who still has his foreskin, as I do. I KNOW what I feel with it and would lack without it. That is just IMPOSSIBLE.

  3. 18 hours ago

    It's THIS different :

  4. 18 hours ago
    Replying to
  5. 18 hours ago
    Replying to
  6. 19 hours ago
    Replying to and
  7. 19 hours ago
    Replying to and

    Yes, always the most feared disease of its day. (in the 19C, masturbation was thought to cause serious illness) has a timeline, almost 1 disease/decade. It's parents and their friends who say that. Drs are taught nothing about the foreskin but how to cut it off.

  8. 20 hours ago
    Replying to and

    The "thousands of medical reports" contradict each other. Even the AAP doesn't recommend MGC, and they're on their own in their wishy-washy stance, so what are you talking about?

  9. 20 hours ago
    Replying to

    That would be very hard. You, however....

  10. 20 hours ago
    Replying to

    How many times have you said "No collusion" now? You seem to think saying it makes it so. The evidence is mounting, starting with the Rs' inexplicable Ukraine turnaround: YOU COLLUDED!

  11. Jan 4
    Replying to and

    If you compare tribal with tribal ( NSFW DISTURBING), surgical with surgical (as FGC in South East Asia is), the differences between male and female pale into insignificance. Ethicially, there is nothing to choose between them.

  12. Jan 4
    Replying to and

    More than 95% of genital cutting in the USA is of goyim. The rest of the developed world doesn't do it. The rest of the English-speaking world used to do it, but has all but given it up for a generation, with no ill-effects. Just as women's issues are trivialised, so it this one.

  13. Jan 3
    Replying to and

    Childbirth? You think those women wouldn't give THESE men BJs? Women's smegma is more copious and pungent than men's, yet women get cunnilingus without needing any bits cut off.

  14. Jan 3
    Replying to
  15. Jan 3

    Search on "botched circumcision" Search on "foreskin".

  16. Jan 3
    Replying to

    Happy to be missing THIS?

  17. Jan 3
    Replying to

    Nah, just abysmal ignorance. Male breasts don't have that function ("purpose"), so cut them off at birth? Earlobes have no function. Cut them off? A foreskin does have various functions.

  18. Jan 3
    Replying to

    Standard practice? Now ~55% and falling, and only that high because the USA health insurance industry continues to profit from it, unlike the rest of the English-speaking world (with universal healthcare systems) that have given it up, without ill-effects.

  19. Jan 3
    Replying to and

    Ah, "sodomy". Bugger me, I haven't heard that word for years! Yes, it was clear your thinking about virology was based in 19th century ideology.

  20. Jan 3
    Replying to and

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·