Basic rule in online journalism: if you change something after publication, acknowledge and explain it. On 1619 Project, NYT just broke this basic *ethical* rule. And to further the cover up @nhannahjones deleted all tweet history. Let that sink in.
-
-
That’s a lesson plan, not reporting or any journalism work. Literally just an abstract about the project. This isn’t the “gotcha” you think it is.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I agree with your explanation about the NYT edit. But what about all the tweets where you say "the 1619 Project argues that the true founding of our country was in 1619"?
- Show replies
-
-
-
Can you discern the difference or are you being deliberately obtuse ?
-
She’s a libertarian...the obtuseness may not be deliberate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Really... this is irrelevant. And you know it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ma'am I don't know who you are but I would think that if historical purity is your pet peeve, you would be up in arms at the historical inaccuracies in the textbooks currently in use in educational institutions from primary to secondary schools. Is the Pulitzer triggering?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.