Someone DM’ed me & said defend billionaires in 2 tweets. Took 3. Curious for your critique or own version (obv generalized): Business ppl (mostly) grow the pie. Gov’t (mostly) splits it (grows some too) W/o business ppl growing pie, there’s less to splithttps://twitter.com/eriktorenberg/status/1224151530980270081?s=20 …
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
When ppl get rich in a sustainable way, ppl should celebrate, b/c, among other reasons, some of that $ goes to gov’t, which means more education & healthcare Without growth, we couldn’t pay for these services. Each public job is in effect “sponsored” by a private job (via taxes)
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 37 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
See recent critique of billionaires for not solving climate crisis. US Gov't has over 4 trillion dollars (collected via taxes vs created via growth). What's better use for public $ than solving climate change? The more ppl become rich, the more money gov't has to do so.pic.twitter.com/5WaTvbKefa
2 proslijeđena tweeta 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
One thing I'd add is I'm surprised when pro-government fans don't want people to become billionaires as long as they are creating sustainable value (e.g JK Rowling)... It means more money for the gov't!
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Erik Torenberg je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceErik Torenberg
Another addition: There are 2 distinct kinds of billionaire complaints: Those that think the $ would be better off distributed more widely among employees & public directly +those that think the gov't should be collecting the money & dispersing it itselfhttps://twitter.com/eriktorenberg/status/1204506799941881857?s=20 …
Erik Torenberg je dodan/na,
Erik TorenbergOvjeren akaunt @eriktorenbergIMO, a better way to redistribute $ is to broaden equity ownership to everyone (use Facebook? here's equity) rather than via gov't We underestimate the psychological effects of equity Align everyone on the way up (unity) instead of fighting for scraps on the way down (divide)Prikaži ovu nit0 proslijeđenih tweetova 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
What if you viewed government redistribution as seed funding of pre-wealthy (usually younger) citizens (so, startups) in return for a stake in future wealth (some of them will be unicorns), rather than as a divisive tax.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.