These may seem like minor features. But they mean the difference between rewriting your repository's commit hashes when size becomes problematic and providing an effortless experience for management of large files in repositories.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
While I'm here, my official viewpoint is that LFS should be considered a temporary solution until version control tools gain features like partial clone which enable them to work with large files "natively." Unfortunately, Git's LFS implementation is a one-way door.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
git-lfs suffers from being third party, thus limited to what git allows without modifying it. It also predates alternate object stores, which should allow a much better, albeit incompatible, version of git-lfs.
-
Yeah, there’s a reason LFS wasn’t accepted into the core distribution. It’s a shame it was/is the most viable solution for years and many are entrapped in it.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.