I don't know much about theosophy, tbh. Maybe @davclark would know. For hermeneutics... Winograd & Flores ? ;)
-
-
I think an intro to theosophy is perhaps more challenging than an intro to Unitarian universalism.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davclark @sbenthall and
perhaps start with biographies of Blavatsky and Krishnamurti? I liked *Star in the East*.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davclark
if I was to dive into a primary source instead, where would you recommend?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare
the turn suggested by Krishnamurti: http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/about-krishnamurti/dissolution-speech.php …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davclark @increpare
Or alternatively pick one of Blavatsky's books that appeals. Amazingly, the theosophists still maintain well-staffed libraries.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davclark
just read https://www.amazon.co.uk/Voice-Silence-H-P-Blavatsky-x/dp/1537167901/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1487958551&sr=8-1&keywords=The+Voice+of+the+Silence+blavatsky … it left me cold - maybe I just don't find theosophy interesting.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare @davclark
I thought I might enjoy mystical writings but it turns out I just like Henry Corbin :P
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare
sound like, "I thought I would like music but maybe I just like Beethoven..."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.