@increpare @edderiofer Someone had to do this... http://imgur.com/a/Rg9mV
-
-
Replying to @That_Scar @edderiofer
had trouble understanding itpic.twitter.com/boECpOdxPA
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare @edderiofer
I've put the marking that you've said is unnecessary everywhere where needed for it not to be ambiguous. Retrying...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Aha! I've needed make/produce/bring to existence and only now realized that Living is all about it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'll define Sight below an object as light (with opposing darkness/dark). That makes a lot more sense.pic.twitter.com/btksAug5c9
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
OK, this time no metaphor but with a really ambiguous thing because you haven't defined it, I can only imply.pic.twitter.com/AZKl5LWGxm
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @That_Scar @edderiofer
"a knowledgable person did not help the living who could see" [2/2]
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare @edderiofer
OK, how do I say "the creation of knowledge" or "the act of learning"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @That_Scar @increpare
This means that *something* created knowledge. If you're referring to just the act, not the fact, I'm not sure.pic.twitter.com/o9v19CDYwC
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
(just realizing my documentation for knowledge is a bit confused...)
-
-
(now fixed)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.