"the change that changes a non-friend to a friend can change someone, and that someone is a good person" (but wasn't made good?)
-
-
Replying to @increpare @That_Scar
if you want square to be made good by the change (I think you do?) you should have them be diagonally connected through it?pic.twitter.com/RJC5w2wCXY
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare
You've wrote that befriending an enemy is what makes you good, which is fine but I wanted to say: ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @That_Scar @increpare
The one who can befriend an enemy is considered powerful/worthy
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @That_Scar @increpare
the top-right says P1 can do ..., P1 is powerful
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @That_Scar
does it? that's what this says. That's not what you havepic.twitter.com/yav2d51rLz
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare
Yeah but if you need to specify what they are capable OF DOING, it changes a bit, you should change syntax for "A can do B" imo
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @That_Scar @increpare
There's a big syntactical difference between "A is capable" and "A is capable of B" in Orthona right now
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @increpare
Reasonable addition, now, do we want to first state who is capable (your picture) or what can be done (rotate climbing diagonal)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't *think* it matters so much. The version with the person on the left might just read better to me because English is SVO
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.