so it's quite difficult to convert a 5500khz audio file to a 44100khz audio file without changing what it sounds like. Audio's weird.
@conniptions for print nope, for images on-screen you have standard known scaling algorithms. anyway. yep: eep.
-
-
@increpare And even then, the 5500khz file might have (probably) sounded how it did *because* of artefacts introduced by the sampling rate. -
@conniptions right - when I was starting I specifically chose the low sample rate for the synth because of the delicious artefacts - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@increpare There's weird and then there's psychoacoustics weird. (Not long finished mixing my third album. Never again. Until next time :) )Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@increpare True. But scaling algorithms always introduce artefacts - in the case of audio such artefacts are *much* more noticeable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@increpare Audio she is a bitch. It's hard enough trying to make stuff sound good when everything was 44100khz to start with ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@increpare Honestly I'd look at starting again at 44100khz with whatever the 5500khz file was generated with if at all possible.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.