@increpare in puzzlescript if I have a rule of the form
[A] [A] -> [B] []
can I require the two As to be different?
-
-
Replying to @InfinitNutshell
@InfinitNutshell nor can you require they be the same (plans for homo and hetero keywords didn't compel)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare
@increpare well if they were the same I would just be writing [A] -> [B], wouldn't I? or you do you mean a weaker kind of same?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InfinitNutshell
@InfinitNutshell I guess it would be quite like that, yes. Though not strictly equivalent, because the two A's could match different things.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @increpare
@increpare this conversation is confusing; what are the preferred puzzlescript terms for types of things vs instances of those things2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@InfinitNutshell ah, do you mean you are looking for the types to be different, or the patterns to not overlap?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.