When you reject logic as the basis for communication, I have nothing more to say.
-
-
Replying to @JonasKyratzes
@JonasKyratzes Because at the level of two people talking in a shared language, logic is of wildly varying relevance.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @D_Nye_Griffiths
@D_Nye_Griffiths Even the basic idea of logic. Arguments. Reason. A follows from B. C is justified by D. The opposite of "it just is".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JonasKyratzes
@JonasKyratzes Ah, you mean _dialectic_. Well, that's a hot mess.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @D_Nye_Griffiths
@D_Nye_Griffiths It's complicated, certainly, but to completely reject it means there can be no communication or debate at all.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JonasKyratzes
@JonasKyratzes Yeah, but dialectic is not formal logic. Formal logic involves the relationships of statements in controlled environments.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@D_Nye_Griffiths @JonasKyratzes whereas dialectic frequently results in sex. <3 dialectic
-
-
Replying to @increpare
@increpare@D_Nye_Griffiths@JonasKyratzes explain, i'm all ears.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.