Wrong but useful. Working @Twitter, tweeting about data science and people management.
"Wait, it's all her views?" 
"Always has been"
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This seems like a pretty useful framework for picking email vs. slack! An intersecting (adjacent?) concern might be public vs. private conversations, which both email and slack can be.
One advantage of teams physically sitting together is the opportunity for osmosis just by overhearing others' conversations. Having other folks copied on emails or chatting in a public slack channel aren't perfect replications of that phenomenon, but they're better than nothing
To foster conversations in public, it might be useful to have some guidance along the lines of "get someone's attention with a DM, but move the discussion to a public channel if relevant"
Also agreed. We're explicit about guidance around DMs vs. public channels for that very reason.pic.twitter.com/21n0xLkAuR
I thought discord channels and discord like features are good for that in a remote environment.
What about discord makes it better than slack?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Fwiw I frame it more as an escalation path rather than a dont use x for
Someone may need to send an urgent email or slack to leverage other attributes of those platforms, but if they want immediate reply, I’m clear about call > text > slack > email as my escalation path
