While I might change the framing from good vs. bad to senior vs. junior, this is an excellent post. It matches up quite well with my experience and personal philosophy of how-DS-justifies-its-own-existence https://twitter.com/IanWhitestone/status/1392178506759610369 …
-
-
The business environment of the late aughts and early 2010's suddenly meant that this was a relevant combo of skills, and the emphasis on people having all three skills meant there needed to be a name for such people. Thus the sexiest job title of the 21st century was born.
Show this thread -
But DS's hype has worn off. Practitioners are disillusioned, and in frustration, they decide to go work as SWEs or ML engineers or PMs because it seems more straightforward to stick to just one circle on the venn diagram.
Show this thread -
But you know what? DS is starting to emerge from its awkward adolescence. It's developing its own identity and carving out its own role in the modern business. And
@IanWhitestone has wonderfully distilled its essence in his postShow this thread -
DS try to get buy in by contributing in the same way that SWEs, MLEs and PMs contribute, but DS is its own craft. DS can be similar to those roles, but it's best when it focuses on its own raw materials and tools and uses them to create value that no other functional role can
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

