I’m not sure I entirely agree with this, but I do like it as a provocation. Early review in a variety of formats can be a driver of code quality, but it’s important more as a means of building trusthttps://twitter.com/pati_gallardo/status/1373343835330383878 …
-
I don't get why this has gotten the engagement it has. Are people this frustrated with Github PRs?
I expect it’s probably related to code review being perceived as a bottleneck, which to be fair, I’ve definitely seen it be. But not giving developers adequate time for code review is more a problem with the org’s culture than with code review itself, IMO
-
-
I agree. To relate this to something outside coding, when I worked at consulting, I used to actively look for someone to review my work so that we can get it shipped.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.