Podcasts are radio. Clubhouse is radio. We keep reinventing radio and packaging it as something else and then we're surprised when it works. Of *course* it works! Radio dominated media for decades.
-
-
Replying to @JHanlon
But now they get to lose money and sell that as a feature to investors for *Billions*
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drexmcarthur
Absolutely. And amazingly they are just re-proving the thesis that content and programming are what matters. In the same way that Quora became Yahoo Answers 2.0 when it scaled, the programming is the value, not the scalability
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JHanlon @drexmcarthur
Content certainly matters, but there are plenty of podcasts that are about absolutely nothing that are still popular. Audio is by its nature more intimate than text, and in a world where parasocial relationships are increasingly common, radio's friend simulation ability is potent
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @imightbemary @drexmcarthur
"about nothing but still popular" -> could this be a difference in how you and I are interpreting the word "content" or do you believe that there's something else going on here?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JHanlon @drexmcarthur
There's probably a difference in how we're thinking of it. What I had in mind was the People Discussing Current Events genre of podcasts, where large fan communities emerge (such as the ones on Reddit emerge) and people talk about the hosts as much as the specific episodes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Perhaps more of what I mean is that engagement around the same sort of content in written form seems to stick to the subject matter, whereas the audio format also tends to generate discussion about the hosts themselves
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

