I'm thinking about various communication forums for teams and a taxonomy for them, so far I have the following categories - communicating status, planning, building alignment, decision making, learning, team bonding. Curious what I am missing. Any good resources?
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @aaronmblevin
Yup communicating status and alignment - Eg staff meetings are this category
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @umanagineer @aaronmblevin
What constitutes a "staff meeting", and what characterizes a good one? I've been in these for leadership teams, but I'm not sure what the individual contributor version should look like
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @imightbemary @aaronmblevin
The ones I am in have a mix of ICs and managers (since me :) ). None are perfect but traits of ones I like are - agenda topics proposed by the group and decided before, a silent meeting intro where everyone reads pre-written updates, shared notes after, rotating note-taker
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A couple of loose success metrics are if the agenda topics aren't always proposed by the meeting caller, everyone contributes i.e. not the same subset talking, attendees periodically learn/reinforce something or decide something that isn't possible without the meeting
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Makes sense! Sounds like good meeting hygiene in general
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

