This is really important. Why aren’t we talking about it? "We may have just discovered a major piece of the puzzle explaining how seemingly independent international organizations help deceive us into consenting to wars and regime change interventionism around the world."https://twitter.com/caitoz/status/1129194527720263680 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So because Peter is right-wing and doesn’t have expertise in the ME or chemical weapons, the statement he received from OPCW and the leaked report are all made up?
Did you read the OPCW statement where it says the man who wrote it is not part of the fact finding mission? Which means he had no direct access to evidence or the site. OPCW makes its judgment based on facts, not speculation. It's judgment is on its website. Read it.
-
-
I read this statement from the OPCW. Where is their statement that Ian Henderson was not a part of the fact finding mission?pic.twitter.com/LEL81yUsDg
-
That's the press release. The OPCW had already told the recipients of the leak that the person who carried out this speculation was not part of the FFM.https://medium.com/@Brian_Whit/leaked-document-revives-controversy-over-syria-chemical-attacks-a40f06a9a13d …
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The troubling thing here is not just that you are wrong, but that you are so committed to your error that you want to believe a wild conspiracy theory instead of looking at the context, or talking to survivors, or consulting extant investigations.
-
There have been over a hundred chemical attacks in Syria. The UN has investigated 37, and each case where it has been able to conclusively establish culpability, the perpetrator has turned out to be the regime.pic.twitter.com/4BhvbIOP9f
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You should watch
@MuradGazdiev on@RT_com.... Then you will know the truth... and nothing but the truth.#Syria#Douma#America - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Furthermore, most are just reading the headlines. OPCW is confirming the report is genuine, i.e., it is saying nothing as to its veracity vis-a-vis the actual investigation which examined facts on the ground.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SyriaWG: We have confirmed that as the engineering expert on the FFM, Henderson was assigned to lead the investigation of the cylinders and alleged impact sites at Locations 2 and 4. We understand that “TM” in the handwritten annotation denotes Team Members of the FFM.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this is called mansplaining.
-
Not this time. This is called “explaining” to someone who is committed to a false narrative being promoted by non-experts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.