To state the obvious: Facebook is not some philosophical debate society where both sides are debating on equal footing. Misinformation receives huge boosts from repeat offenders who face no consequences for sharing false info:https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/eric-trump-donald-trump-jr-amplified-claims-election/story?id=74261329&cid=social_twitter_abcn …
-
-
Afficher cette discussionMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I think we should have a public debate whether ppl should be chasing MarkZ towards rails with tar and feathers. I urge everyone not to start this seemingly excellent idea until it is properly vetted by untrustworthy sorts.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
It's the hypocrisy of the pseudo-libertarian bubble at its finest.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Do you think things would be much different if Facebook simply removed misinformation?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Same applies to Twitter and its little labels. There is absolutely no public interest in debating lies. But they seem to think there is one. Those lies must be taken down.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Not FBs job to determine the truth & there has been ample proof the election was not 100% on compliance.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Yep. When people are pre-conditioned to reject any info that’s not fed by Trump or the right wing echo chamber, they will accept no opposing views.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.