Hey folks, your timeline is a bit confusing. In some places you say "3 week discussion", in some others you say "November 5-15" (which is only 10 days). How long is the discussion period actually?
-
-
-
It's clarified better in the review e-mail. "5 - 15 November: Discussion with Authors/Reviewers/ACs". "15- 22 Nov: Discussion with Reviewers/ACs.". They count this total as "3 weeks of discussion and deliberation".
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thanks for the update. Many papers only have 2 reviews. Is there going to be a definite update adding at least a third review where it is missing? Or will the decision for many papers rely on 2 reviewers only? I feel like basing the decisions on 2 reviews only seems dangerous.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Tough reviews, but fair and very constructive feedback
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Can I edit abstract twice ?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Is the rebuttal deadline 2pm PST (https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2020/Dates …) or 7am PST (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pm2YJmrHDIWOISd0Pg8ZcPZKwQnBKAphOVYKlhrxvOk/edit …) on Nov 15?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
We are now in a 3 week discussion period. Please continue to be factual and respectful in responses.