To paraphrase @miike, "conferences filter obviously bad papers, and then accepting good papers at random" - which is fine in a sense.
-
-
Replying to @ianhorswill
@ianhorswill@mtrc@miike Amen. And this is deeply problematic.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @togelius
@togelius@ianhorswill So would having a policy of accepting any paper that isn't explicitly rejected encourage more positivity do you think3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianhorswill
@ianhorswill@mtrc Yes, that's a pretty good system, but my experience is that it is hard to make reviewers follow a new system.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @togelius
@togelius@ianhorswill@GET_TUDA_CHOPPA I'm interested in talking to you all (and others) more about this stuff in 2015.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtrc
@togelius@ianhorswill@GET_TUDA_CHOPPA Are you at Dagstuhl, Ian?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@mtrc @togelius @GET_TUDA_CHOPPA Yup. See you at Dagstuhl!
-
-
Replying to @ianhorswill
@ianhorswill@togelius@GET_TUDA_CHOPPA Let's chat about this there for sure! I want to hear more experienced views.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtrc
@mtrc@ianhorswill@togelius I think there are lots of things to be discussed at Dagstuhl next month. Super exciting.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.