The Peterson takedown in the NYT carries this lesson: It doesn't matter how nice and reasonable you are. If you are perceived as a threat to hegemony of the neoliberal elite, you will be attacked and demonized.
-
-
>he's also shown awareness of how he would be destroyed by "a single wrong word" so he's hypercareful I've heard him say that, too, but
@jordanbpeterson has already spoken so many heresies that it would take far more than a "single wrong word" to bring him down now. -
It's not the message but the framing, as you know. It's all about selecting your words very carefully. it's why most people can't handle it.
-
They will still cherry pick to make a person sound like a terrorist.
-
They've already done the worst there - and got hammered for it. Basically, like Uber, Peterson 'bootstrapped' a maniacal fanbase/audience to cultural cachet, which is not anymore vulnerable to the usual cherry-pick-and-destroy maneuvers.
-
What they will be looking for now are things that may work - sexual impropriety (unlikely to find any), personal failings with colleagues and neighbors, that sort of thing.
-
Even if there's no impropriety they can make up one lol.
-
Yeah but that's more dangerous - making shit up is legally tricky when it's about verifiable EVENTS as opposed to BELIEFS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.