I have allied with non-mallus against fellow mallus, both inside and outside India. Sometimes that had to be done.
Anyway your thesis is 'overfitting' the data. Britain doesn't control the US. Read post in full AT LEAST http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2011/02/viscount-hinchingbrooke-demurs.html …
-
-
Reading. No, it was only said that US independence is incomplete, not that it isn't independent. 'Controlled' is a term more apt for Canada.
-
Anyway what you said is also the same thing. Seeing itself as the successor or whatever, they still continue Britain's policies and help it
-
retain power in its old haunts.
-
Yeah why woudn't they? Anglos populated the anglo american world - silly to think of them as being confined to the sceptred isle.
-
When you revolt against the King, you do it for different ideals, and you try to apply these instead when you become the boss.
-
Yeah and then reality of power and dominance kicks in. The Civil War for instance less than a century after.
-
The South agreed with North on the issue of separating from the Crown. Civil war wasn't fought to re-join with Britain.
-
What remains is opportunistic collaboration. For that both North and South collaborated with Britain.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.