So, what we really need is jails for convicts and jails for the accused (under trials), where conditions can be reformed.
-
-
Replying to @_Mauna_
Once a person is convicted, this means he needs subsistence level treatment. Nothing more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Mauna_
Liberal Modernity perverts this common sense approach. Even hospitals are becoming resorts. So folks don't fear falling sick.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Mauna_
Actually prison itself is a progressive reform. It's a very bad system. As much as possible, prison should be avoided.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @_Mauna_
Instead we have the old school approach - capital punishment for VERy serious crimes, corporal punishment (whipping in public) for less
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @_Mauna_
and labor/restitution for non-violent and solely perhaps white collar crime.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
I think I completely agree with what you said. Makes a lot of sense.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Mauna_ @i_contemplate_
Gets rid of "free food and board" at state expense. Hardened criminals don't care about going to jail.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Mauna_
Exactly, also avoids socialization of non/less violent with more violent, and recruitment.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
Do we all realise we can't live like Breivik is living today if we worked hard all our lives? Such luxury and security.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
'Compassion' produces such absurdity. Kill 60 teenagers, enjoy lifetime playstation, gourmet food and exercise.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.