Sorry. That doesn’t work for me because it alters the character of the State I envisage. it is completely unsamskritic to my understanding
Okay, so let's say we can start with all of these you find unobjectionable :P, and push the envelope as things get more serious.
-
-
are not beyond contemplation for a long long time now. These are partly issues for which I voted this lot. But I see no start.
-
Right, infact they require a lot of legal changes because right now X/M are higher status legally.
-
No laws have been changed, status quo infact entrenched.
-
Laws have been changed. That monster called the 93rd amendment. The rest comes from judge made law, hence easier to change.
-
Well I was talking about NDA2. They've done nothing besides entrench IOI jurisprudence and law.
-
Which is quite a silly ends to have in itself. It’s like chasing your own tail. Gotta get tired at some point in time.
-
I think their strategy is for overwhelming political dominance acting as a honey to attract flies. Hmm..deprive ecosystem of oxygen?Not sure
-
Could well be. But so far the agenda appears to be the cow. Not a great advertisement for scale of strategic thought.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
These are all matters of parity. They are also matters that require little change in current legal regime. Or the changes they do require
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.