Probabilistically, it's a trendline which is unmistakable and uncontradicted. Anyway, we know our positions. You're rational so let's wait.
-
-
In any case, you can be creative yourself - go on think up how to 'solve' this problem.
-
I will always favour absorption and retain the very Indic ability to co-existence with the other. Ofc react in times when co-existence is
-
breached by the other. That’s a natural law anyway. Not really so much of a strategy or a tactic.
-
What do you propose to do about Deoband?
-
And be relentless in the application of criminal law where their ideology seeks blood.
-
Okay, so let's say we can start with all of these you find unobjectionable :P, and push the envelope as things get more serious.
-
are not beyond contemplation for a long long time now. These are partly issues for which I voted this lot. But I see no start.
-
Right, infact they require a lot of legal changes because right now X/M are higher status legally.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Process well under way. FCRA rules are strict, being enforced and not one of the chest beaters have challenged judicially.
-
It's shallow yet. The biggest culprits are the respected American foundations like Ford, Carnegie, Pew, Rockefeller, Soros.
-
If PHFI’s license can go then that means the range of their activities is starting to get limited.
-
Well let's hope you're right. Let's see. But all this just gives you scope for action internally.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A problem universally identified. And if it even needs that sanctity (it doesn’t) then first identified by MMS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.