Great, honest disagreement is fine. Just don't hide behind words like 'hate', 'bile' etc.
-
-
I have no issues if such activities are undertaken outside the auspices of the State.
-
I'm no longer a libertarian in this case. State has to create a differential status regime - being M or X cannot be 'equal' with being an H
-
Sorry. That doesn’t work for me because it alters the character of the State I envisage. it is completely unsamskritic to my understanding
-
Your understanding is ahistorical. Dharma/samskar requires craftiness, a Machiavellian attitude for the social good.
-
Then we’re back to step 1. Identifying the problem. We see it differently. Hence I see it as self-defeating in these times to create an
-
outcaste caste - as it were - of M and X. In the modern world this won’t work well for us.
-
The 'modern world' is not an abstract construct. Machinations and fissures are exploited by Western NGOs. Have to throw them out first.
-
In any case, you can be creative yourself - go on think up how to 'solve' this problem.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You ban all schismatic foreign funding of madrassas. Bust all criminal networks of mullahs in the Gangetic plain (drugs, weapons, girls)
-
With you entirely. I think there is no dearth of literature on the link b/w Saudi funding and radicalisation. One such was written by Dhume.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.