I’ve been clear with you on my points. Not hiding from anything. What you acknowledge as the truth appears untrue to me.
-
-
Allow gharwapsi by creating programs where people who return get communal support instead of being shunned (as mostly happens)
-
I have no issues if such activities are undertaken outside the auspices of the State.
-
I'm no longer a libertarian in this case. State has to create a differential status regime - being M or X cannot be 'equal' with being an H
-
Sorry. That doesn’t work for me because it alters the character of the State I envisage. it is completely unsamskritic to my understanding
-
Your understanding is ahistorical. Dharma/samskar requires craftiness, a Machiavellian attitude for the social good.
-
Then we’re back to step 1. Identifying the problem. We see it differently. Hence I see it as self-defeating in these times to create an
-
outcaste caste - as it were - of M and X. In the modern world this won’t work well for us.
-
The 'modern world' is not an abstract construct. Machinations and fissures are exploited by Western NGOs. Have to throw them out first.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t get what “higher” status entails. In my view complete parity - which we are some way off from - translates to strength through nos.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.