This is not a lesser known fact. It was an amorphous idea which is precisely why it had very limited currency for a long time.
-
-
Sure. And in many parts of the country the otherness of the monotheists isn’t as obvious as you seem to state as a matter of rule.
-
Probabilistically, it's a trendline which is unmistakable and uncontradicted. Anyway, we know our positions. You're rational so let's wait.
-
I even accept that. But I’m faced always with the issue of a moral response to the proposed exclusion of 200 million. How does it happen?
-
You eat an elephant one bite at a time. You make Indic civ higher status than monotheist, restore temples and schools.
-
Allow gharwapsi by creating programs where people who return get communal support instead of being shunned (as mostly happens)
-
I have no issues if such activities are undertaken outside the auspices of the State.
-
I'm no longer a libertarian in this case. State has to create a differential status regime - being M or X cannot be 'equal' with being an H
-
Sorry. That doesn’t work for me because it alters the character of the State I envisage. it is completely unsamskritic to my understanding
- 19 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.