So what DO we need to throw out, is the question.
-
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @Outsideness
Moldbug wrote extensively on all this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Outsideness
Right, but what's this?pic.twitter.com/yJCts7UJ9D
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
See I've read the entire blog diligently! And remarks like that are what I'm contesting. The irrational dismissal of a useful field.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes its whig moorings need to be removed, but you just agreed that most of it wouldn't change.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @Outsideness
Concepts such as supply and demand, scarcity, roundaboutness etc. Wouldn't change. What would change is their application and relevance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Outsideness
Now we're getting somewhere. Seems like this area needs to be developed. Or do you have thoughts already/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @Outsideness
I defer to Moldbug, and
@mr_scientism mostly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Moldbug hewed very closely to Austrian n neoclassical econ, but encapsulated within 'sovereign judgment.' If so, that's perfectly reasonable
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You will note he flipped on the concept of individual level sovereign property.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes I'm including the 'pig philosophy' posts in this.
-
-
You will note he adds human civilisation to pig Philosophy. Subsumption of economics to humanity changes its color.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.