Call 'private' property secondary property. Now what? Just as the Carlylean ship, to go around the Cape must obey nature's laws...
-
-
Everyone knew this before the advent of Whigs and the 16th C property/sovereignty clusterfuck.
-
So what DO we need to throw out, is the question.
-
Moldbug wrote extensively on all this.
-
-
See I've read the entire blog diligently! And remarks like that are what I'm contesting. The irrational dismissal of a useful field.
-
Yes its whig moorings need to be removed, but you just agreed that most of it wouldn't change.
-
Concepts such as supply and demand, scarcity, roundaboutness etc. Wouldn't change. What would change is their application and relevance.
-
Now we're getting somewhere. Seems like this area needs to be developed. Or do you have thoughts already/
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You do realize attempts at universalising capitalism work to elide this issue?https://reactionaryfuture.wordpress.com/2016/08/30/wikipedia-and-absolutism/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.