Lets be clear secularism is nothing but hinduphobia in a cocktail dress.https://twitter.com/5Forty3/status/843391517469396992 …
Lol what is this discussion even. Let's get back to basics. 'Secularism' not required for 'rights'
-
-
matlab ainvayin, humein nahin jana basics pe, humein to patang udaani hai, kaatni hai to maanjha tight karo

-
Haha. Theek hai udaayiye aap. _/\_
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Read Jakob de Roover. Even Shivaji treated Muslim civilians decently. What is your fear?
-
I am not particularly fearful. I think things will work out, with formal secular constitution + hindutva
-
That refinement of 'secular constitution' will require lots of work to be even partially credible. Can't handwave
-
well, my point is that formally secular constitution is a good idea (and here to stay).
-
for foreseeable future... Bcz it is workable and activation energy of alternatives is not worth the price
-
in the end, mine is a pragmatic argument, not a moral one.. And ppl can go for ideals, so who knows
-
I'm doubtful that it's workable as it has shown no evidence of that and its votaries can't seem to act impartial
-
Where are ideas for 'secularism' coming from? Harvard, Columbia SJWs now. Good luck achieving a pragmatic outcome
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.