Could you explain more? 'True indology' could simply be the truth of history which he does share I think. @guNagarbhaH
-
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_
If "true indology" is arrived at by "truth of history" and our notion of history is itself different, then
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SkandaVeera @guNagarbhaH
What Aurangzeb's motivations were for certain actions does not seem to depend on that no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
Imagine our narrative is "mlecchas invaded us, looted murdered arsoned raped converted & brutalized our land"
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SkandaVeera
Then we are talking of our civilizational experience and there is no need to even debate Aurangazeb's motives
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SkandaVeera @guNagarbhaH
How can there be no debate on such questions? I believe you are mixing the teleology of history with factual discn
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
Its not about being "factual" its about reference point of experiences that we fail to get into narrative.
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SkandaVeera @guNagarbhaH
No doubt! But this fight must be fought as well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
That people are doing anyway to some extent :) ultimately the "acad" method and goal itself should be H.
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Absolutely agreed! There's so much actual hard work to be done. I don't see anyone doing this sadly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.