Could you explain more? 'True indology' could simply be the truth of history which he does share I think. @guNagarbhaH
What Aurangzeb's motivations were for certain actions does not seem to depend on that no?
-
-
Imagine our narrative is "mlecchas invaded us, looted murdered arsoned raped converted & brutalized our land"
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH -
Then we are talking of our civilizational experience and there is no need to even debate Aurangazeb's motives
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH -
How can there be no debate on such questions? I believe you are mixing the teleology of history with factual discn
-
Its not about being "factual" its about reference point of experiences that we fail to get into narrative.
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH -
No doubt! But this fight must be fought as well.
-
That people are doing anyway to some extent :) ultimately the "acad" method and goal itself should be H.
@i_contemplate_@guNagarbhaH -
Absolutely agreed! There's so much actual hard work to be done. I don't see anyone doing this sadly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.