if they are worried about their 'muslim' status
-
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_
I find it quite problematic when I catch sight of humanities jargon like orthopraxis being applied as automatic endpoint
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dikgaj
based on supposed territorial+historical-era restricted demarcation of "exceptionalism", or very superficial equations of models of "god".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dikgaj
such conclusions can only be drawn by someone who either has never studied in depth the praxis as it evolved/orimposed over a wide area/time
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dikgaj
or has studied it but deliberately ignores the counter-facts as it doesnt support his theory. This is a completely unrealistic revisionism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dikgaj
that desire/drive to see Islam in a particular way that situates it within "all" religious constructions, as some common neural construct
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dikgaj
while dismissing the equilibrium trough of biology/sexuality as gibberish shows interesting ways in which religious upbringing itself
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dikgaj
can colour, perhaps subconsciously, how superficial attempts at deconstructing one's basis in the religion - pan out.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dikgaj
That's fair. As a 'scientific' exercise (pardon the hackneyed term), how would your biological theory be possibly falsified?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
testable - definitely! if one goes through the historical track record of Islam not only in ME.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Great, looking forward to your blog post, you should write more! Also, perhaps improve the design of blog? ;)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.