Like Nehru was "chosen" for leading, while idealists like Bhagat Singh brutally and ruthlessly eliminated, maybe same could
the National Party election in the 40s, and the new 'apartheid' regime itself was opposed by Brits
-
-
The fundamental nature of the state didn't change. Brits would have had enough handles. If they severed, then it would make
-
Brits even more obsessed about revenge. They would have had contacts among Blacks too.
-
I'm not comfortable with 'God of the Gaps' arguments like this. You could be right but no indication so far that's the case.
-
Believe it or not, people can be venal and self-serving, forgetting larger purposes. doesn't have to be intel
-
Of course. But the old masters can help such things along. Like they helped with India's partition. Created Muslim league
-
and Pak movement out of thin air. Even Ambedkar was seen writing that Brits used to give to the league more than what even
-
they had themselves asked for.
-
Brits had power in the world arena far disproportionate to their size. They involve/mediate even b/w giants like US & USSR.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.