Tibet. Americans were ready to help in Tibet's case. It was Nehru's and Govt of India's decision. Must be UK's work.
-
-
Replying to @LenteCurrite @i_contemplate_
They had hatred for India after being forced to give independence .. Didn't want Indian influence in neighborhood.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite @i_contemplate_
Like Nehru was "chosen" for leading, while idealists like Bhagat Singh brutally and ruthlessly eliminated, maybe same could
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite @i_contemplate_
have happened in SA also; power transferred to a class of pliable and foolish leaders.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite
Except that SA was not a colony at that time, and for decades.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
Virtually colony. A generation of fools groom the next one. Deep level intel contacts continue.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite @i_contemplate_
They had no real existence without Britain's overall commonwealth umbrella of protection. Not much direct connection to US.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite @i_contemplate_
Could not depend on their underclass -- as the nation was Black. Then the Boer elites too didn't want to uplift the poor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite @i_contemplate_
Due to them being such a minority, and even inside that a big class issue, they were extremely dependent on UK.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite
Not quite true. They had nuclear bombs, near self sufficiency in agriculture, a huge coastline, a powerful military
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
South Africa could easily survive on its own even.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.