not in the sense he defined there. in fact I don't see how his theory can be rejoined with spontaneous order at all.
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
It requires detaching the concept from its ideological accoutrements to kernel of -> 'undesigned equilibrium'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
but according to himself, there is nothing undesigned. it's merely a case of the designers being hidden by custom...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
Keep in mind he's said that the divided power centers do not necessarily have to do things that make 'sense' just accrue powr
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @cyborg_nomade
In that sense, it's a short/medium termist myopia.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
indeed. still don't see how that can be reconciled to spontaneous order.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
it can't be...from his definition, but it can from mine at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
what's your definition? his is fully compatible with Hayek et al.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_
seems consistent with his (I would have quibbles about unintended, but peripheral). but still his view precludes undesigned
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes as he subsumes both positive and non-interventionist action as 'design'
-
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_
there's a policy choice in non intervention. but that's far from arguing everything that follows from that is designed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade
Agreed. I disagree with him on this and his bulverism but still feel VERY thankful for his buzzsaw. It's needed to declutter
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.