RF's definition of communism is exactly 180-degrees off (as he'd know if he ever spoke to communists).
-
-
RF's theory is that absolutism would infact result in massive decentralization and 'freedom' (as we define it)
-
He counts HK as part of his model as well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The only confusion I'm seeing is the invocation of mole-rat metaphysics to legitimate non-populist government
-
Will have to think further but I think RF is hampered more by his style than theory.
-
His 'theory' is a Fnargl fable.
-
"But you understand that Fnargl doesn't actually exist, right?" "Communist!"
-
have you seen his response to the "Fnargl-ring" allegations? "tu quoque"
-
Probably missed this. (He's begun to bore me.)
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.