still in doubt on that. what do you see wrong with Singer's take?
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @edwest
He imports a moral framework from the spectral plane, rather than building with what Darwin provides.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @edwest
I can only quote from The Book of Gnon: "Fact / value orthogonalism is a Leftist Abomination."
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Does this mean the 'Is-ought' issue is...not one?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Naturally.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
*shuffles uncomfortably*
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What we "ought" to do is not detachable from learning about what works. The (dominant) alternative is deontological hubris.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
That's much milder than what I was imagining.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Sounds as if what you were imagining is more fun.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
We ought to compress value space to do X.
6:50 PM - 2 Nov 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.