repression started again, and Soviet Union declined. The greatest force is an enthusiastic Volk,
-
-
Replying to @LenteCurrite
Volk could only be employed with modern weapons which made mass armies feasible, and even monarchies adopted
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @LenteCurrite
'Volk'ish mobilization is also not the same as commoners simply joining forces - which society had.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
What is the difference? The state, or sections of the state, controls the mobilization?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite
The 'nationalist' drive is the difference, with delegation/decentralization, missing in volkish mobilization.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @LenteCurrite
Note that even after Napoleon adopted this, the English while fielding mass armies, did not use volkish rhetorc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
The English used other people and other people's resources to defeat Napoleon. Prussian Army, Russian Army,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite @i_contemplate_
resources from colonial India, etc..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LenteCurrite
Indeed, that's the usual method of the fiendish island.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
It cannot be ruled out that the revolution itself was instigated from London. It is so close.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Hah agreed, it's possible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.