Not anarchist. Just ambivalent. I am unable see a way to avoid it but not happy about it.
It's no paradox at all - for the same destructive forces should have been crushed with an iron heel.
-
-
If a dynasty's time to perish has come, it cannot be delayed for too long. Mughals perished even after all
-
Cyclical view is one then, surely this cannot be held against the form of monarchy at all but merely dynasty
-
Of course, I'm not against monarchy per se. But if it is simply restored without corrective measures, then
-
same old processes will unravel it.
-
Yes so now we get to the crux of the problem - the monarchs used Protestantism to defeat church to secure power
-
This memeplex then went out of control, and unravelled the Throne itself.
-
May I suggest this post? Search for 'Wycliffe' and read from therehttps://reactionaryfuture.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/the-iron-law-of-rebellious-tools/ …
-
Ahh! Interesting. Of course, it is a persistent and disturbing pattern -- but must we accept it as immutable?
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.