Most people can at least get motivated by idealistic principles and give their best, if not be the leaders.
Doesn't that assume that anything that is good will endure? Need I say more?
-
-
They can't have been so good, if they fell to ghazis or nihilists. Maybe they were nowhere like caricatures
-
in history books but surely there were reasons? France almost fell earlier but a commoner Jeanne d'Arc saved.
-
Depends on 'good' - whether good to common folk (most Indian kings were), or wise and strong enuf to defeat inv
-
Then ponder the paradox of Louis during French Rev being the LENIENT, 'liberal' one relative to older.
-
It's no paradox at all - for the same destructive forces should have been crushed with an iron heel.
-
If a dynasty's time to perish has come, it cannot be delayed for too long. Mughals perished even after all
-
Cyclical view is one then, surely this cannot be held against the form of monarchy at all but merely dynasty
-
Of course, I'm not against monarchy per se. But if it is simply restored without corrective measures, then
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.