Which has repeatedly and catastrophically failed to validate.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev @davidmanheim and
Back in the 60s very smart people got very big computers to model economics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth …
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @davidmanheim and
Ouchhhh. Never thought of this reference before. Allende Climatology! Cybernetics!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think the lukewarmists are most likely right. There's a strong theoretical argument, but...
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @i_contemplate_ and
...too many people along the research chain are resting their thumbs lightly on the scales.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
I still don't see how they can deduce that it's due to 'human factors'. Is the MWP talking point wrong?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It's a somewhat hard theoretical problem, but if you have a physics based model that you can run...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidmanheim @i_contemplate_ and
...it to compare cases with and without additional CO2, now and in the past, and see how it changes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidmanheim @i_contemplate_ and
IF the model is correct, that will tell you the relative contributions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidmanheim @i_contemplate_ and
But yes, it's possible that you can validate the model and still have things wrong in offsetting ways.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah retrospective, but must include all available data including the Medieval Warm Period.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.