We had postulated that the Dravidians possibly expanded as consequence of cultural contacts with Arya-s sometime after the later invaded
-
-
Replying to @blog_supplement
That this drAviDa "cultural revolution" was linked to their adopting Arya traditions& expanding into the southern subcontinent receives some
1 reply 7 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @blog_supplement
some support on the new data on L1 Y haplogroup expansion times and its partial coupling with that of Arya R1a HGpic.twitter.com/EtO81qbDRp
2 replies 8 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @blog_supplement
@blog_supplement Would it be terribly inaccurate to think of the Roman conquest of Greece as a parallel?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ In the most general terms: it should be however noted that the Alexandrian conquests spread greeks before&both were IE1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blog_supplement
@blog_supplement Yes true. So in this case, there was no Dravidian 'cultural flowering' before Aryas.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ I personally find no evidence for that though that gentleman you pointed to Khan holds some such position.On this issue I am1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @blog_supplement
@i_contemplate_ more like Witzel in seeing no major Dr role in IVC; before Arya-s they were a non-Dr substratum who had their own flowering2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @blog_supplement
@blog_supplement Is this reflected in genetics? I suppose we'll find out from Rakigarhi.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ It is a complex but solid linguistic argument. Rakhigarhi might be interesting but we need data on European scale2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@blog_supplement That seems unlikely to come about for a while, if at all...damn. Thank you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.