Ideally India may need 1000 nuclear reactors by 2050 but perhaps settle for a minimum of 400http://swarajyamag.com/technology/why-india-needs-hundreds-of-nuclear-reactors/#demo …
-
-
Replying to @prasannavishy
@prasannavishy Ohh, are you trying to flirt with me? :-D1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @orsoraggiante
@orsoraggiante Did recent nuclear liability law change please you? Enough to start the investment cycle? Waste of effort?@prasannavishy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ I'm a little confused now. There's clear clash between the CSC and CLNDA. Wonder how they'll smoothe that out@prasannavishy1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @orsoraggiante
@orsoraggiante Perhaps this gives more leeway to executive branch to resolve, hence more likely to be resolved.@prasannavishy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ I think so too; domestic law cannot be in conflict with India's international obligations@prasannavishy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orsoraggiante
@orsoraggiante Great! Something to be happy about amidst the doom and gloom in policy.@prasannavishy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ Well...I've heard a counter argument too, so let's see how this plays out@prasannavishy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@orsoraggiante Understood. Cautious optimism then. @prasannavishy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.