Level 1: You sound like the outgroup, so I will mock you.
-
-
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
Level 2: Your model is plausible, but I don't think it is correct.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
Level 3: You have provided an existence proof, but I don't think it's representative.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
Level 4: You have shown that your model covers the majority of cases, but there is a notable minority that it doesn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
Level 5: Your model covers the vast majority of cases, but I find it unacceptable for ideological reasons.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
I am not sure if this can be extended in either direction, or even if it describes a single coherent thing. Feedback appreciated.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
@ContentOfMedia Isomorphic to the Gandhian 'laugh, fight, win' I suppose and much more accurate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.