@nydwracu It isn't wrong to differentiate between bad, good, better, much better, probably best for now et al @i_contemplate_
@_Mauna_ For that they'd first have to accept the possibility of truth. It's like the Kubler-Ross model of grief applied to loss of sacred.
-
-
@i_contemplate_ An ex. the whole of eugenics studies wud have still carried on if it were not for Hitler's Germany. After Hitler it was evil -
@_Mauna_ It was used as a pretext to shut down genuine scientific inquiry, not just 'eugenics' studies. -
@_Mauna_ The problem for them is that due to advancement of genomics, whole lot of data has gotten ahead of their ideological constructions. -
@_Mauna_ Lots of scientists studying things under 'population genetics' using different words (not using 'race' for example).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@i_contemplate_ They blindside the truth or shall we say, human experience bcs they have decided it leads to bad outcomes. -
@_Mauna_ Yes, this attitude is also obviously anti-their love of science. Willing to get people sacked, shouted down to prevent inquiry.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.