This reads like sophistry to me so if someone who ACTUALLY KNOWS natural selection can comment, I'd appreciate. http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/01/evolution-is-random-process.html …
-
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ even if you accept his argument re: definitions, it doesn't change or disprove anything.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@i_contemplate_ I don't think sophistry is an unfair characterization here.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp Right I used it after some consideration as I like VoxDay.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ I don't have an easy time taking somebody seriously that does middlebrow nitpicking like that though.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp He clearly enjoys making midwits run around headless. It's amusing to watch sometimes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@i_contemplate_ who's the greater fool? The fool or the fool that argues with fools?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp Bah I meant to share this one instead: http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/01/explaining-probability.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
@bitemyapp "number of generations needed for small selective changes to spread are too great to fit the timescales required." [modified]1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bitemyapp This one is the most easily debunked w.r.t lactose tolerance, and high altitude lung capacity.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.